The couple, who are now enemies in a legal disagreement, were as soon as a married couple and had a little one with each other. The spouse who initiated the divorce process did so as a result of claims of physical misuse by the other spouse.
The representative of this legal action submitted a counterclaim versus the complainant for spousal support and residential property department, saying that the factor for the marital relationship break down was instead the complainant.
This agent quickly started to ask about the complainant’s building information, and completed and submitted the property division declaration before the first due day. In addition, although the name of the business site is currently the plaintiff, he actively insisted on transferring the name of business site since the acused has been running business website entirely. 상속 유류분 반환 청구.
As a result, the Complainant and Accused reached a negotiation where the Complainant would obtain 50 million won in properties as part of the building division, instead of the Accused acquiring the names of both the newlywed home and the office, as agreed upon in the initial arbitration.
It was a situation of terrific importance in that the defendant, who wished to continue running business, achieved his function.
* The end results of successful legal battles can vary significantly from one person to an additional.
Therefore, the plaintiff and the offender accepted offer the plaintiff 50 million won in residential or commercial property department rather than the offender getting both the name of the newlywed house and the name of the work environment in the very first mediation. It was an extremely considerable instance because the accused, who wanted to proceed operating business, attained his function.
The Plaintiff (the customer of the YK Regulation Office) offered KRW 70 million to his son-in-law after hearing from the Accused, that is his son-in-law, in 2009 that he was attempting to sign a sales contract for the purpose of financial investment, however the financial investment was insufficient.
This litigation agent (legal representative accountable of YK Legislation Office) proactively prepared a pleading by submitting the information of the account transfer as proof to prove that the plaintiff provided cash to the accused because the complainant did not write a separate finance certificate while lending money to the offender.
The accused proactively refuted the plaintiff’s issue, claiming that the plaintiff did not provide money to the defendant, yet gave it to the accused and his child, A, to supply an apartment.
In order to shoot down the Accused’s case once more, the lawsuits agent submitted as proof ① a recording file adn text taht the Accused admitted that the cash moved by the Complainant throughout the discussion with A was obtained, and ② the information of the Accused paying the PLaintiff rate of interest on the financing around 2013.
Furthermore, because the lending was used by the accused to buy and sell the apartment, and the accused took all of the list price also after getting rid of the home, the above loan was not obtained jointly by the offender with A, but submitted a document and proof showing this.
Consequently, the court acknowledged the disagreement offered by the lawsuits agent and determined that the plaintiff is called for to compensate the offender for the whole quantity borrowed, which was KRW 70 million, considered that the complainant provided the lending to the defendant independently, as opposed to collectively with A.
It can be testing to figure out whether money exchanged in between family members, like a son-in-law and mother-in-law, is a loan or a gift. However, the legal agent effectively demonstrated that the cash provided by the mother-law to her son-in-law was a loan, not a gift. Because of this, she obtained back all the cash she had lent to her son-in-law, which was a favorable result.
The spouse, who patronizes of the YK Legislation WOrkplace, belongs to a legally identified union with his partner and has a pending situation including a small.
The customer has been committed to their marriage and profession, never taking a day of rest. Nonetheless, their spouse has actually shown a lack of interest in residential obligations and has actually been excessive in their investing. Regardless of offering the majority of their salary to cover living expenditures, the customer’s spouse has filed for separation, wrongly charging them of adultery. Looking for guidence, the customer has turned to this lawful rep for therapy. 변호사 상속
The suit attorney rebutted his wife’s inaccurate accusation of extramarital relations by giving evidence that the failure of their marital relationship resulted from her careless financial behavior, as sustained by factual information.
The lawyer concentrated on collecting details regarding his partner’s monetary activities by that the partner aggravated the common possessions of the couple by moving over 100 million won to her moms and dads’, and and that she sustained expenditures of numerous won monthly utilizing the card, while the customer constantly worked and included in the common assets of the couple.